The PR triage workflow mentioned Dosu inside inline-code formatting and before the final footer, which did not reliably wake the bot. Move the handoff so the last non-empty comment line is a plain-text @dosubot request, matching the working PR template pattern.
Constraint: GitHub bot mentions can be sensitive to markdown formatting and comment placement.
Rejected: Leave the mention as a copy-paste hint | it does not satisfy the maintainer need for automatic bot triggering.
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Directive: Keep the generated triage comment's final non-empty line as a plain-text @dosubot request.
Tested: bun run check:policy
Tested: git diff --check
Tested: bun run check:pr
The desktop product needs a repeatable local gate that can prove the core Coding Agent loop still works after changes, not only that unit tests pass. This adds a quality-gate runner with PR, baseline, and release modes, structured reports, explicit quarantine metadata, and fixture-based live baseline cases that can run across provider/model targets.
Constraint: Existing check:pr and CI policy behavior must remain usable while the stronger baseline grows around it
Constraint: Default PR gates must not require real model credentials or provider quota
Rejected: Build a standalone QA platform first | too heavy before the baseline task shape is proven
Rejected: Keep unstable server exclusions hardcoded in run-server-tests | hides quarantine policy from reports and future review
Confidence: medium
Scope-risk: moderate
Directive: Expand baseline cases by adding focused fixtures and verifiers; do not make normal PR checks depend on live providers
Tested: bun test scripts/quality-gate/*.test.ts scripts/quality-gate/baseline/*.test.ts
Tested: bun run check:server
Tested: bun run quality:gate --mode baseline --allow-live --provider-model 2944f963-ce75-45b7-bac1-6e4f57df0970:kimi-k2.6:volc-kimi-k2.6 --provider-model 9c78d3df-7fb5-44c7-8436-3a41c3a59231:MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed:minimax-m2.7
Not-tested: desktop UI browser smoke and native release mode in this commit
Pull requests need a deterministic way to show changed areas, required checks, missing-test signals, and CLI-core risk before review. This adds a path-based policy gate, local impact reporting, PR triage labels/comments, and reusable check scripts so reviewers can evaluate blast radius without trusting contributor claims.
Constraint: CLI core should remain effectively frozen unless a maintainer explicitly overrides it.
Constraint: Default PR checks must be safe for external forks and avoid live model/provider calls.
Rejected: Run live provider tests on every PR | secrets, cost, network, and vendor instability would make the gate noisy and unsafe.
Rejected: Use Dosu as the merge gate | AI review is useful for risk explanation, but deterministic Actions must own blocking checks.
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: moderate
Directive: Keep real model/provider smoke tests in maintainer-controlled workflows; do not make them required for untrusted PRs.
Tested: bun run check:impact
Tested: bun run check:policy
Tested: ruby YAML parse for PR workflows
Tested: git diff --check
Tested: bun run check:native
Tested: npm run docs:build
Tested: bun run scripts/pr/run-server-tests.ts
Tested: bun run check:adapters
Tested: bun run check:desktop
Not-tested: GitHub-hosted pull_request_target label/comment execution before opening this PR
