mirror of
https://github.com/NanmiCoder/cc-haha
synced 2026-07-17 13:13:35 +08:00
7ca25687fd
Text-only IM channels forced users to copy long permission request IDs from mobile chat, which made approval slow and error-prone. This keeps the requestId-based authorization protocol intact while adding short replies for the single-pending-request case and preserving full command fallbacks for ambiguous cases. Constraint: IM authorization must still resolve through the existing requestId permission_response path Rejected: Replace request IDs with global numeric IDs | concurrent permission prompts would make numeric IDs ambiguous across chats Confidence: high Scope-risk: moderate Directive: Do not allow short numeric replies when more than one permission request is pending in the chat Tested: cd adapters && bun test common/ telegram/ feishu/ dingtalk/ wechat/ Tested: cd adapters && bunx tsc --noEmit Tested: bun run check:adapters Not-tested: Real WeChat or Telegram account end-to-end message delivery
44 lines
2.4 KiB
TypeScript
44 lines
2.4 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from 'bun:test'
|
|
import {
|
|
formatPermissionDecisionStatus,
|
|
formatPermissionInstructions,
|
|
parsePermissionCommand,
|
|
parsePermitCallbackData,
|
|
} from '../permission.js'
|
|
|
|
describe('permission helpers', () => {
|
|
it('parses text permission commands', () => {
|
|
expect(parsePermissionCommand('/allow req-1')).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-1', allowed: true })
|
|
expect(parsePermissionCommand('/always req-2')).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-2', allowed: true, rule: 'always' })
|
|
expect(parsePermissionCommand('/allow-always req-3')).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-3', allowed: true, rule: 'always' })
|
|
expect(parsePermissionCommand('/deny req-4')).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-4', allowed: false })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('parses short replies when one permission is pending', () => {
|
|
const pending = new Set(['req-1'])
|
|
expect(parsePermissionCommand('1', pending)).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-1', allowed: true })
|
|
expect(parsePermissionCommand('2', pending)).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-1', allowed: true, rule: 'always' })
|
|
expect(parsePermissionCommand('3', pending)).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-1', allowed: false })
|
|
expect(parsePermissionCommand('/always', pending)).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-1', allowed: true, rule: 'always' })
|
|
expect(parsePermissionCommand('永久允许', pending)).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-1', allowed: true, rule: 'always' })
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('does not parse short replies when multiple permissions are pending', () => {
|
|
expect(parsePermissionCommand('1', new Set(['req-1', 'req-2']))).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('parses callback permission actions', () => {
|
|
expect(parsePermitCallbackData('permit:req-1:yes')).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-1', allowed: true })
|
|
expect(parsePermitCallbackData('permit:req-2:always')).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-2', allowed: true, rule: 'always' })
|
|
expect(parsePermitCallbackData('permit:req-3:no')).toEqual({ requestId: 'req-3', allowed: false })
|
|
expect(parsePermitCallbackData('permit:req-4:unknown')).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('formats text fallback and status labels', () => {
|
|
expect(formatPermissionInstructions('req-1')).toContain('回复 1')
|
|
expect(formatPermissionInstructions('req-1')).toContain('/always req-1')
|
|
expect(formatPermissionDecisionStatus({ allowed: true, rule: 'always' })).toContain('永久允许')
|
|
expect(formatPermissionDecisionStatus({ allowed: false })).toContain('拒绝')
|
|
})
|
|
})
|