The WeChat and DingTalk IM docs were behind the actual desktop adapter flow, especially around QR binding versus user pairing and how users discover slash commands when no platform menu exists. This records the setup path with screenshots and nudges paired users toward /help from the bot itself.
Constraint: DingTalk does not expose the same menu setup path documented for Feishu, so command discovery must work through chat text.
Rejected: Document commands only in VitePress | users may be on mobile when they need the commands.
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Directive: Keep IM command docs aligned with adapters/common/format.ts when adding commands.
Tested: cd adapters && bun test common/ dingtalk/ wechat/
Tested: cd adapters && bunx tsc --noEmit
Tested: bun run check:docs
Tested: bun run check:adapters
Not-tested: Live WeChat or DingTalk message delivery with real platform accounts
DingTalk can receive interactive card callbacks, but the card UI still depends on a published template, so the adapter now supports a template-backed card path with text commands as the reliable fallback. Telegram and WeChat use the same allow-once, allow-always, and deny semantics so manual authorization behaves the same across platforms.
Constraint: DingTalk button rendering requires an operator-provided interactive card template id
Rejected: Treat the existing AI streaming card template as a permission card | it cannot guarantee visible action buttons
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: moderate
Directive: Do not remove the text approval fallback unless DingTalk card template provisioning is guaranteed
Tested: bun test adapters/common/__tests__/permission.test.ts adapters/dingtalk/__tests__/permission-card.test.ts adapters/telegram/__tests__/telegram.test.ts adapters/common/__tests__/config.test.ts src/server/__tests__/adapters.test.ts
Tested: bunx tsc -p adapters/tsconfig.json --noEmit
Tested: bun run check:adapters
Tested: cd desktop && bun run build
Tested: bun run check:server
Tested: bun run check:docs
Tested: git diff --check
Not-tested: bun run quality:pr is blocked by existing CLI core approval policy; see artifacts/quality-runs/2026-05-03T13-19-56-232Z/report.md
WeChat needs a QR-paired path instead of bot-token setup, so the adapter layer now includes the iLink protocol calls, desktop pairing UI, server-side bind/unbind APIs, and shared IM command behavior. Empty project history falls back to the user's default work directory so mobile /new works without pre-opening a desktop project.
Constraint: Tencent iLink login returns a URL that the desktop UI must render as a QR image locally
Constraint: IM adapters should keep /new, /projects, status, permission, and default workdir behavior consistent across WeChat, Feishu, and Telegram
Rejected: Require users to paste absolute project paths for first WeChat sessions | mobile onboarding should work from the default user working directory
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: moderate
Directive: Do not change WeChat polling back to overlapping intervals; getupdates is a long-poll endpoint and must remain serialized
Tested: Real WeChat QR scan, inbound /status, outbound reply, and unbind E2E
Tested: bun run check:adapters
Tested: bun run quality:pr
Not-tested: Re-scan live WeChat after the default-workdir fallback tweak; covered by adapter config tests and PR gate
