The WeChat and DingTalk IM docs were behind the actual desktop adapter flow, especially around QR binding versus user pairing and how users discover slash commands when no platform menu exists. This records the setup path with screenshots and nudges paired users toward /help from the bot itself.
Constraint: DingTalk does not expose the same menu setup path documented for Feishu, so command discovery must work through chat text.
Rejected: Document commands only in VitePress | users may be on mobile when they need the commands.
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Directive: Keep IM command docs aligned with adapters/common/format.ts when adding commands.
Tested: cd adapters && bun test common/ dingtalk/ wechat/
Tested: cd adapters && bunx tsc --noEmit
Tested: bun run check:docs
Tested: bun run check:adapters
Not-tested: Live WeChat or DingTalk message delivery with real platform accounts
DingTalk can receive interactive card callbacks, but the card UI still depends on a published template, so the adapter now supports a template-backed card path with text commands as the reliable fallback. Telegram and WeChat use the same allow-once, allow-always, and deny semantics so manual authorization behaves the same across platforms.
Constraint: DingTalk button rendering requires an operator-provided interactive card template id
Rejected: Treat the existing AI streaming card template as a permission card | it cannot guarantee visible action buttons
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: moderate
Directive: Do not remove the text approval fallback unless DingTalk card template provisioning is guaranteed
Tested: bun test adapters/common/__tests__/permission.test.ts adapters/dingtalk/__tests__/permission-card.test.ts adapters/telegram/__tests__/telegram.test.ts adapters/common/__tests__/config.test.ts src/server/__tests__/adapters.test.ts
Tested: bunx tsc -p adapters/tsconfig.json --noEmit
Tested: bun run check:adapters
Tested: cd desktop && bun run build
Tested: bun run check:server
Tested: bun run check:docs
Tested: git diff --check
Not-tested: bun run quality:pr is blocked by existing CLI core approval policy; see artifacts/quality-runs/2026-05-03T13-19-56-232Z/report.md
DingTalk uses QR registration to store client credentials, then reuses the existing IM pairing and session bridge. The merged main implementation keeps the existing WeChat QR binding path intact while adding DingTalk as a peer IM platform. The default IM workdir now falls back to the local user working directory so a newly bound chat can start immediately even when recent-project history is empty.
Constraint: Local main already carries WeChat IM, so the merge keeps WeChat config, QR binding, sidecar args, and unbind behavior intact while adding DingTalk.
Rejected: Keep empty defaultProjectDir as project-picker-only | newly bound IM users can hit a dead end with no recent projects.
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: moderate
Directive: Keep IM platform unions synchronized across config, pairing, sidecar args, desktop settings, and docs.
Tested: bun test common/ dingtalk/ wechat/; bun test src/server/__tests__/adapters.test.ts; cd adapters && bunx tsc --noEmit; bun run check:policy; bun run check:server; bun run check:desktop; bun run check:adapters; bun run check:native; bun run check:docs
Not-tested: quality:pr full gate was blocked by existing local main CLI-core diff requiring allow-cli-core-change maintainer approval; live post-fix DingTalk second-message delivery was not repeated after the merge.
